Exploring the dynamics of global leadership

Global Leadership Project logo (light) Global Leadership Project logo (dark)

The Global Leadership Project (GLP) provides data on government leaders throughout the world – including legislators, members of the executive branch, and members of the judiciary. The database currently covers 162 countries and over 70,000 political leaders across 1,471 political bodies and 2,052 social groups.

By cataloging the backgrounds and career paths of thousands of political leaders, the GLP gives scholars, policymakers, and citizens a clearer picture of who holds power and how leadership patterns vary, providing an evidence base for studying institutions and guiding practical reforms.

[Research] [Gallery] [FAQ]
[Bibliography]

Data


Research

Introducing the GLP

John Gerring, Erzen Oncel, Kevin Morrison and Daniel Pamstein. 2019. “Who Rules the World? A Portrait of the Global Leadership Class”, Perspectives on Politics 17:4. [PDF] [.bib] [>]

  • Overview: Before we can explain how power works, we need to know who actually wields it. This article assembles a worldwide roster of top officeholders, detailing their backgrounds and career paths. The result is a factual description important for later testing theories about elite circulation, governance quality, and the impact of institutional design.

Baselines & Compositional Effects

John Gerring, Connor T. Jerzak, Erzen Öncel. “The Composition of Descriptive Representation.” American Political Science Review, 118(2): 784-801, 2024. [PDF] [.bib] [>]

  • Overview: Grasping demographic baselines—how current office‑holders would stack up against citizens chosen at random—clarifies how selection into leadership reflects compositional realities: the make‑up of the population and role of institutional features such as body size. By measuring representation gaps compared to this baseline, we can isolate which skews arise from population dynamics and which are artifacts of institutional design choices.

Role of Institutions

John Gerring, Alan Hicken, Connor T. Jerzak, Robert Moser, Erzen Öncel. “Electoral Rules and Descriptive Representation: A Comprehensive View Across Multiple Identities.” Under contract with Cambridge University Press, 2026. [PDF] [.bib] [>] [Get Notified]

  • Overview: Electoral design does not simply record preferences; it allocates voice. Focusing on districts where ethnic minorities form the plurality, we derive specific conditions under which rules do—and do not—convert demographic weight into seats, and bring to light a large set of newly considered elections in this examination.

Tools

Representation Calculator

DescriptiveRepresentationCalculator: Characterizing Observed and Expected Representation [R package]. CRAN. doi.org/10.32614 [Tutorial] [.bib] [>]



Frequently Asked Questions about the Global Leadership Project

Quick answers about the Global Leadership Project database, downloads, tools, and descriptive representation country rankings.

TL;DR

  • Need leader-level data? Start with the GLP database and dataset downloads.
  • Need country benchmarks? Use the descriptive representation rankings (gender, ethnicity, religion, language).
  • Need to compute indices yourself? Use the Representation Calculator / DescriptiveRepresentationCalculator tools.

What is the Global Leadership Project (GLP)?

The Global Leadership Project (GLP) is an open database of government leaders worldwide that helps you study who holds power and how leadership patterns vary across countries and institutions. It catalogs leaders’ backgrounds and career paths so scholars, policymakers, and citizens can build evidence-based analyses and reforms.

Which types of political leaders does GLP include?

GLP includes legislators, members of the executive branch, members of the judiciary, and other decision-makers whose power may be formal or informal. If an office directs policy, the project aims to track who holds it and how they got there.

How large is the GLP database (countries, leaders, and institutions)?

GLP currently covers 162 countries and 70,000+ political leaders across 1,471 political bodies and 2,052 social groups. Coverage grows over time as new leaders and institutions are added in updated releases.

Is GLP open source and free to use?

Yes—GLP’s data and tools are open source, with a focus on transparency and analytic rigor. That makes it practical for research, teaching, journalism, and policy work without building a leadership dataset from scratch.

How do I download GLP data and replication files?

Start with the GLP Data page to download datasets and replication materials hosted on Dataverse and Hugging Face. For representation benchmarks, the Country Rankings page also links to a country-level download (CSV) plus the underlying GLP data release.

GLP data vs. Country Rankings: what’s the difference?

GLP data is the leader-level database (who served where, plus background and identity attributes), while the Country Rankings are a derived, country-level benchmark of descriptive representation. Use GLP when you need microdata; use Rankings when you need quick cross-national comparisons across gender, ethnicity, religion, and language.

What is “descriptive representation” in political science?

Descriptive representation asks whether leaders “look like” the population they govern along identity dimensions such as gender, ethnicity, religion, or language. In practice, it compares group shares in a political body to group shares in the population to quantify how closely they match.

What is the “representation gap index,” and how should I interpret it?

The representation gap compares observed representation to what we’d expect under random selection from the population, so values closer to zero mean smaller gaps and more negative values mean larger shortfalls. In short: RepresentationGap = ObservedRepresentation - ExpectedRepresentation.

Why do the country rankings cover 156 countries (not all 162)?

The current rankings include countries that meet a data-quality threshold (at least 75% completeness for the demographic traits being analyzed). When missingness is limited, the rankings use a principled imputation procedure so countries remain comparable.

How are the Country Rankings calculated?

For each country and identity dimension, GLP compares the observed shares of groups in national leadership to an expected benchmark under a random-sampling baseline, then aggregates those indices into an overall score. The result is a standardized benchmark you can use to compare countries and track representation gaps over time.

What tools does GLP provide (calculator, interactive apps, and more)?

GLP provides an R-based Representation Calculator for quantifying descriptive representation, plus online tools for Country Rankings and interactive visualizations. You can also use the Hugging Face apps to compute representation gaps and explore leader profiles in a browser.

Observed vs. expected representation: what do those mean?

Expected representation is the baseline you’d anticipate if leaders were selected randomly from the population given population shares and body size. Observed representation is the index computed from the real composition of a body (e.g., a cabinet, legislature, or court), which you can compare to the baseline.

What is GLP best for (and what is it not designed to replace)?

GLP is best for questions about who holds power—leadership composition, representation, and elite career paths—within and across countries. It is not a substitute for surveys or policy-position datasets; instead, it complements those sources with leader-level context.

How should I cite GLP data and the Country Rankings in my work?

Cite the relevant publication (for example, “The Composition of Descriptive Representation”) and the specific dataset release you downloaded (Dataverse or Hugging Face). The Data and Country Rankings pages provide download links and bibliographic info to make citation straightforward.

How can I report an issue, request a correction, or collaborate with GLP?

Use the contact information on the About page for data questions, corrections, or collaboration, or use the linked GitHub repositories to open issues for tooling and methods. GLP supports reproducibility with public datasets, open-source tools, and replication materials.